CHALLENGE TO LAW ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL:
In 2008 several Palo Alto Police Officers conspired to edit and falsify audio/video recordings to conceal their crimes while simultaneously using the falsified recordings to incriminate a citizen of a crime. The California Attorney General's Office and the Santa Clara County District Attorney's Office has been provided with irrefutable evidence consistently and persistently since 2008 to the present. Rather than present all of the crimes this challenge will focus on just one crime, that being the deliberate destruction of evidence, California Penal Code 135, and the conspiracy to violate this law by more than one of the officers, Penal Code 182. Evidence to the commission of these crimes is provided here and it is up to Attorney General Kamala Harris, Senior Assistant Attorney General Gerald Engler and Santa Clara County District Attorney Jeff Rosen to prove that a violation of penal code 135 has not occurred. There is a minimum of 30 days for the statue of limitations to run out on February 14, 2014. This may be extended to as late as August 2014. Harris, Engler and Rosen have 30 days to file charges against the culpable officers. Please note, this challenge need not prove exactly who violated penal code 135, it only needs to prove that California penal code was violated by someone under the supervision of Palo Alto Police Department Supervisors. The job to identify the specific person and or persons belongs to those authorities, the AG and DA, who have the investigative powers, subpoena and warrant, to identify who are the culpable parties. Contact information for Kamala Harris, Gerald Engler and Jeff Rosen will be provided at the bottom of the page for them or anyone who is a law enforcement official to present their position. If they cannot refute the evidence demonstrating that the violation has occurred and refuse to prosecute the culpable officers then we will have empirical evidence that the law enforcement community is not capable of holding itself accountable. This challenge is open to any law enforcement personnel. If you agree that Penal Code 135 has been violated reply and state so. If you believe that Penal Code 135 has not been violated, state so with your legal and factual evidence that supports your position. The Law: Pursuant to the U.S. Constitution and Supreme Court's decision in, Brady v. Maryland, the withholding exculpatory evidence violates due process "where the evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment"; California Government Code 34090 and 34090.5 states that under certain circumstances original documents, records, documents, papers, books and instruments may be destroyed if an exact duplicate is made of the original in which no tampering could have taken place. California Penal Code 1054.1 (c) states that the prosecution is to disclose all all relevant real evidence seized or obtained as a part of the investigation of the offenses charges. (This includes prosecutiong agencies assisting in the prosecution as they are a part of the "prosecution team.") California Penal Code 135 states: "Every person who, knowing that any book, paper, record, instrument in writing, or other matter or thing, is about to be produced in evidence upon any trial, inquiry, or investigation whatever, authorized by law, willfully destroys or conceals the same, with intent thereby to prevent it from being produced, is guilty of a misdemeanor." California Penal Code 141 (b) states: "Any peace officer who knowingly, willfully, and intentionally alters, modifies, plants, places, manufactures, conceals, or moves any physical matter, with specific intent that the action will result in a person being charged with a crime or with the specific intent that the physical matter will be wrongfully produced as genuine or true upon any trial, proceeding, or inquiry whatever, is guilty of a felony punishable by two, three, or five years in the state prison." 182. (a) If two or more persons conspire: (1) To commit any crime. (2) Falsely and maliciously to indict another for any crime, or to procure another to be charged or arrested for any crime. (3) Falsely to move or maintain any suit, action, or proceeding. (4) To cheat and defraud any person of any property, by any means which are in themselves criminal, or to obtain money or property by false pretenses or by false promises with fraudulent intent not to perform those promises. (5) To commit any act injurious to the public health, to public morals, or to pervert or obstruct justice, or the due administration of the laws. |
|